Dive Transient:
- A federal choose on Thursday allowed the U.S. Naval Academy to proceed utilizing race in its admissions selections for now, rebuffing the anti-affirmative motion group that efficiently sued over different schools’ race-conscious admissions insurance policies.
- U.S. District Choose Richard Bennett denied College students for Honest Admissions’ request for a preliminary injunction in opposition to the Naval Academy. Bennett informed SFFA representatives throughout a Thursday court docket listening to that they’d not satisfied him their case would succeed in opposition to the navy establishment, in keeping with information experiences.
- SFFA is arguing the Naval Academy’s insurance policies are discriminatory, violating equal safety rights beneath the Fifth Modification. It has introduced an analogous lawsuit in opposition to the U.S. Navy Academy at West Level.
Dive Perception:
SFFA helped orchestrate the downfall of race-conscious admissions insurance policies on the U.S. Supreme Courtroom in June. The group had challenged race-conscious practices at Harvard College and the College of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, arguing they have been prejudicial in opposition to sure racial teams.
The excessive court docket agreed, however particularly exempted navy establishments.
In a footnote within the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote navy academies might have “doubtlessly distinct pursuits” from different establishments.
However that ban ought to prolong to navy academies, SFFA argued in its twin lawsuits in opposition to the Naval Academy and West Level. It sued West Level in September and the Naval Academy in October.
“By tethering its use of race to the racial demographics of the enlisted corps and the nation as an entire, the Academy is violating equal safety,” SFFA wrote in its criticism in opposition to the Naval Academy.
